3 Comments

That’s an interesting take—if the story of Satoshi Nakamoto were purely about the creation of a decentralized digital currency, it might be more believable. But the fact that blockchain is at its core complicates things.

Think about it: Blockchain isn’t just a currency mechanism; it’s an immutable ledger—a system designed for transparency and trust, yet created by an anonymous figure who vanished without a trace. That contradiction is what fuels the mystery. If Satoshi truly wanted decentralization, why embed a technology that could one day be used for absolute surveillance and control?

It raises a deeper question: Was Bitcoin a rebellion against financial tyranny, or was it always a prototype for something far more controlled? A system that starts as freedom but evolves into total oversight? After all, the most effective way to get people to adopt a new financial system is to make them think it’s their escape.

Expand full comment

In Satoshi’s defense, he was inventing something completely new, groundbreaking. Back then the only way to make a decentralized currency was to make it public and transparent.

Expand full comment

Great commentary, Ron!

So many people view crypto as the end-game, completely missing the mechanism, block-chain. I’m eagerly watching what comes next.

Expand full comment